🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an event that began as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has developed a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate gatherings where Black people are paid to address white audiences about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The wave has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in October in the UK, Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since that time, placing less emphasis on the accounts of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and increasingly on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the month is commemorated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a instructive case in how appropriation leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month better than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a resurgent right in the shape of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the summer we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels emboldened to state that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are surging in the EU as a whole.

In the United States, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A effort to erase African American heritage and experience from the records is ongoing. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the celebration symbolises how minimally it can be impactful if it is confined to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content commemorations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the conditions of the contemporary world. It also shows how its restricted time span means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is needed. A university professor, a educator at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just eliminate events including Black History Month entirely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an foundation that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not evade political issues, and leaves space for people, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the current situation of far-right rallies in the public spaces? Organizations who celebrate it should not be comforted with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and awareness of “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that face all if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and responsive. Maybe an total re-identification is in order – Black History is Now Month.